| |
10 foreclosures for every
home saved April
14, 2010
The Obama administration's mortgage-modification program is
not keeping pace with the deluge of foreclosures hitting the
market, a government watchdog found. Only 168,708
homeowners have received long-term mortgage modifications
under the president's plan, as of February, a small fraction
of the 6 million borrowers who are more than 60 days behind
on their loans, according to the Congressional Oversight
Panel's latest report, released Wednesday. The
president's foreclosure-prevention plan will likely assist
only 1 million troubled borrowers, short of the
administration's original goal of up to 4 million
homeowners. The program is funded with $50 billion in
Troubled Assets Relief, or TARP, funds, putting it under the
panel's purview.
"For every borrower who avoided foreclosure through HAMP
last year, another 10 families lost their homes," the panel
said of the administration's Home Affordable Modification
Program. "It now seems clear that Treasury's programs, even
when they are fully operational, will not reach the
overwhelming majority of homeowners in trouble."
Getting a loan will be
pricier
The panel's report is the latest to slam the president's
foreclosure-prevention efforts. Last month two other
government watchdogs released blistering reports that
slammed the administration for poor implementation of the
program and raised doubts that 4 million troubled borrowers
could stay in their homes. While the panel commends
the Treasury Department for its push to convert more trial
adjustments to long-term modifications, it lays out several
concerns, including the long-term sustainability of the
modified mortgages and the ultimate cost and goals of the
program. Also, the panel is concerned that the half-dozen
foreclosure-prevention programs launched by Treasury over
the past year has resulted in confusion and delays.
After initially unveiling the loan-modification plan in
February 2009, the administration rolled out programs aimed
at: the unemployed; those who owe more than their homes are
worth; and borrowers with second liens. Also, the government
is funneling $2.1 billion to housing agencies in 10 states
where home prices have dropped significantly. And, the
administration has set up a program to encourage short
sales, where servicers allow borrowers to sell their homes
for less than the value of their mortgage. In response to
the panel's criticism, the Treasury Department said its
efforts will help prevent many foreclosures. A Treasury
report to be released Wednesday will show that 230,000
homeowners have received permanent modifications as of the
end of March.
"We strongly agree with the COP's assessment that
foreclosures are at an unacceptable high rate, which is why
this program has been designed to prevent avoidable
foreclosures," a spokeswoman said in a statement. "As we
have said before, these programs are not intended to help
every homeowner in trouble."
Second liens and principal reduction
In its report, the panel noted the importance of helping
borrowers with second liens and of reducing loan balances
for those whose homes have greatly dropped in value. The
Obama administration last month required banks to consider
principal reduction as a way to modify home loans to an
affordable monthly payment, but did not require that they
actually lower the mortgage balance. Though consumer
advocates say both these steps are critical, banks have
moved slowly on both these fronts. At a Congressional
hearing on Tuesday, lawmakers grilled bank executives about
their efforts to modify second liens and to reduce
principal. Officials from Bank of America, Citigroup,
JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo told representatives that
they support such initiatives, but on a limited scale.
"There are certainly individual cases or even segments of
borrowers where principal reduction may be appropriate,"
said David Lowman, chief executive officer for home lending
at JPMorgan Chase. But "broad-based principal reductions
could result in decreased access to credit and higher costs
for consumers, because lenders will price for principal
forgiveness risk." |
|